A US House bill reintroduced earlier this month has raised alarm over potential its interference with International Criminal Court (ICC) investigations of Israel. This bill aims to offer protection to individuals accused of war crimes, reported by the New Arab on January 8th.
Known as the “Illegitimate Court Counteraction Act,” bill HR 8282 is Republican-led by 76 co-sponsors. It seeks to impose sanctions on individuals engaged in ICC investigations, following the issuing of ICC arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in November. Israel has appealed these warrants, disputing their legitimacy.
The bill argues that the ICC, not being an authority over the US or Israel, lacks jurisdiction over either nation. Both the US and Israel are not parties to the Rome Statute, the treaty which underpins the ICC, and thus, according to the bill’s text, “the ICC has no legitimacy or jurisdiction over the United States or Israel.” It further condemns the ICC’s actions against Israeli officials, asserting they are “illegitimate and baseless.”
The American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) has voiced its support for the bill, underscoring the potential danger in setting a precedent for investigations against non-signatory nations. With the US and Israel standing outside the ICC’s jurisdiction, AIPAC claims the investigations are harmful to US-Israel relations and global diplomatic ties.
READ: ICC issues arrest warrants for Netanyahu, Gallant, Deif
Italy says it would have to arrest Netanyahu following ICC warrant
Despite its passage in the House earlier this year, the bill failed to advance in the Senate, mainly due to opposition from Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer. However, with the Republican party gaining majorities in both chambers of Congress, sponsors are optimistic about the bill’s prospects.
Opposition to the bill has been strong, with the Biden administration issuing a statement condemning HR 8282. The White House argues that the bill could lead to sanctions against judges, court staff, and other individuals associated with the ICC, potentially targeting US allies who cooperate with the court.
Civil rights groups, including the Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR), have also expressed concern, calling the bill a political manoeuvre aimed at undermining international justice. CAIR’s statement criticised the legislation for its selective approach to international law, pointing out that “Congressional support for the International Criminal Court is eternally in flux, depending on whom the alleged war criminal is.”
The debate over HR 8282 continues to highlight the tension between US foreign policy, international accountability, and the role of the ICC in addressing war crimes. As the bill advances, it may mark a significant shift in how the US engages with global justice systems.
The New Arab
+ There are no comments
Add yours